Add more Nano Server variants #545
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
After digging a little, it looks like this was an honest oversight in #472 -- the tests all pass (and we run two separate Java tests on these images). 🤷 |
yosifkit
approved these changes
Jan 22, 2025
docker-library-bot
added a commit
to docker-library-bot/official-images
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 22, 2025
Changes: - docker-library/openjdk@cd21f0d: Merge pull request docker-library/openjdk#545 from infosiftr/moar-nanoserver - docker-library/openjdk@534646f: Add more Nano Server variants - docker-library/openjdk@bf64d21: Merge pull request docker-library/openjdk#544 from infosiftr/ltsc2025 - docker-library/openjdk@865aad9: Add Windows Server 2025 variant
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This is a trial (see #544 (comment)).
If it works, we can merge it as-is, if it doesn't, we can update the code to comment these out with a note about what failed.